On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 02:22:51PM -0400, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 08:00:41PM +0200, Solène Rapenne wrote:
> 
> > > Remove it?
> 
> > Why remove it? Because it's python2? Do we have a python2 expiration
> > policy? (I see others OS have a deadline for python2 removal, maybe
> > we should do the same)
> 
> It's python2.
> It's not available from its author, only from our mirror of the distfile
> on ftp.openbsd.
> It parses packets and hasn't been updated.
> 
> > If it works and that we don't have alternative in ports I think
> > we should keep it.
> 
> If folks *use* it, I'm ok with keeping it. However, it was imported more
> than 11 years ago and hasn't been updated. It's homepage advises others to
> use a different project. The source file isn't available.
> 
> Honestly, the more I investigate this, the *less* I'd like it to stay.
> 
> > There is a python3 pcapdiff at https://github.com/isginf/pcap-diff
> > I don't know if it's a fork of net/pcapdiff though.
> 
> Someone could do a port of that.
It also depends on net/py-pcapy and sooner or^Wthan later Python 2 will
go which means this dependency will go as well.

If actual *users* object we can postpone removal, but if noone barks I
see no point in keeping cruft like this - I'd even argue that removing
the legacy version would encourage users to port the new Python 3
version.

OK kn

Reply via email to