On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 01:20:16PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote: > On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 12:59:23PM +0200, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 11:20:09AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > On 2020/08/18 13:10, Brad Smith wrote: > > > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 03:58:12AM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > > > > > Here is a start at an update to GCC 8.4.0. > > > > What will be the status of gfortran? Currently, on OpenBSD 6.7, > > in order to get a functioning gfortran I have to install lapack from ports > > and use /usr/ports/pobj/lapack-3.8.0/bin/gfortran > > This is a small shell wrapper around /usr/local/bin/egfortran from the > g95 package (g95-8.3.0p5 on OpenBSD 6.7-stable): > > $ cat /usr/ports/pobj/lapack-3.8.0/bin/gfortran > #!/bin/sh > exec /usr/local/bin/egfortran -B /usr/ports/pobj/lapack-3.8.0/bin "$@" > > > $ pkg_info -c g95 > Information for > https://ftp.hostserver.de/pub/OpenBSD//snapshots/packages/amd64/g95-8.3.0p7.tgz > > Comment: > GNU compiler collection: f95 compiler > > > To find packages, I recommend using the pkglocatedb package. > > $ doas pkg_add pkglocatedb > $ pkglocate gfortran
still, it leaves in the open the question of installing (e)gfortran. I got egfortran built from source (as a part of gcc-8.3.0) in the process of installation of math/lapack Do you say that a binary package for (e)gfortan does not exist? Why is the package gfortran obsolete? > would likely have led you there. still confused, Dima
