Hi Anthony, On Sat, 30 May 2020, at 22:10, Anthony J. Bentley wrote: > I think we should package by family instead. This would reduce the number > of packages to about one third of our current approach. E.g.: iosevka, > iosevka-term, iosevka-fixed in one package; iosevka-slab, > iosevka-term-slab, iosevka-fixed-slab in another; and so on.
Fair point. I think I was trying to keep packages small as it's likely users would only use one of the three in each set, however, I suspect that within a family they're quite similar and compression can take care of the rest. > Personally I'd prefer a subdir over MULTI_PACKAGES also. Do you mean like fonts/noto-*? I'm not that familiar with ports. As Iosevka's releases happen in tandem across all families the subdir approach initially strikes me as a bit more laboursome to update many Makefiles. That is in contrast to say Noto where Emoji, CJK and main all have different release schedules. I'll happily give it a go, however. -- Chris Rawnsley
