On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 03:21:40AM +0000, Lucas wrote: > Here is patch for the proposed approach. It's two attachments actually, > one for src and one for ports. I think I didn't miss any documentation > spot and did a test build of just one package, but I didn't do a bulk > nor any other stress test. > > You can also find attached the script output of said test build. make > update-plist failure seems to be related to a missing bit of > configuration I haven't been able to debug yet (PORTSDIR gets picked > up as /usr/ports instead of /home/cvs/ports). > > -Lucas
No, it's just a question of giving cache/ to the right user, there's no need for a complete new set of variables.
