On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 12:59:30PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2020/03/08 12:40, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > py-sip-qt5 attached for completeness, it is the same as the last one from
> > Landry. OK sthen@ to import that unhooked, then we can hook it to the build
> > when switching over.
>
> py-sip-qt5 needs this added:
>
> MAKE_FLAGS += CC="${CC}" CXX="${CXX}"
> i had it fixed locally by amending the existing patch copied from py-sip: $OpenBSD: patch-specs_openbsd-g++,v 1.2 2017/03/02 15:10:15 espie Exp $ Index: specs/openbsd-g++ --- specs/openbsd-g++.orig +++ specs/openbsd-g++ @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ TEMPLATE = app CONFIG += qt warn_on release link_prl QT += core gui -QMAKE_CC = gcc +QMAKE_CC = cc QMAKE_LEX = flex QMAKE_LEXFLAGS = QMAKE_YACC = yacc @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ QMAKE_CFLAGS_SHLIB = -fPIC QMAKE_CFLAGS_YACC = -Wno-unused -Wno-parentheses QMAKE_CFLAGS_THREAD = -pthread -QMAKE_CXX = g++ +QMAKE_CXX = c++ QMAKE_CXXFLAGS = $$QMAKE_CFLAGS QMAKE_CXXFLAGS_DEPS = $$QMAKE_CFLAGS_DEPS QMAKE_CXXFLAGS_WARN_ON = $$QMAKE_CFLAGS_WARN_ON but i'm fine with MAKE_FLAGS too - fixed version attached. still uncertain on the naming ? x11/py-sip-qt5 ? upstream names it PyQt5-sip... py-qt5-sip ? who cares ? going to start an amd64 bulk with your patchset, but i agree we should commit this soonish to avoid more churn. I'm globally okay with the patchset anyway, and all the consumers i tested were fine (except tortoisehg but i suppose its local as it works for rafael) Landry
py-sip-qt5_2.tgz
Description: application/tar-gz
