What do you think about the idea of deleting keepassx and set a pkgpath in keepassxc?
Here is a quote from the keepassxc FAQ: Q: Why KeePassXC instead of KeePassX? A: KeePassX is an amazing password manager, but hasn't seen much active development for quite a while. Many good pull requests were never merged and the original project is missing some features which users can expect from a modern password manager. Hence, we decided to fork KeePassX to continue its development and provide you with everything you love about KeePassX plus many new features and bugfixes. -- https://keepassxc.org/docs/#faq-keepassx Everything keepassx can do, so can keepassxc and more. "File format compatibility with KeePass2, KeePassX, MacPass, KeeWeb and many others (KDBX 3.1 and 4.0)" It feels so right! RS Index: Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/ports/security/keepassxc/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.27 diff -u -p -u -p -r1.27 Makefile --- Makefile 20 Jan 2020 06:28:12 -0000 1.27 +++ Makefile 22 Feb 2020 06:33:57 -0000 @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ COMMENT = management tool for password a V = 2.5.3 DISTNAME = keepassxc-${V} +REVISION = 0 CATEGORIES = security Index: pkg/PLIST =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/ports/security/keepassxc/pkg/PLIST,v retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -p -u -p -r1.18 PLIST --- pkg/PLIST 20 Jan 2020 06:28:12 -0000 1.18 +++ pkg/PLIST 22 Feb 2020 06:33:57 -0000 @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ @comment $OpenBSD: PLIST,v 1.18 2020/01/20 06:28:12 rsadowski Exp $ +@pkgpath security/keepassx @bin bin/keepassxc @bin bin/keepassxc-cli %%browser%%
