On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 11:08:42PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 05:49:33PM +0100, clematis wrote: > > Taking recent feedback into account here's a new tarball including those > > additional changes: > Can you clarify what "recent feedback" that was? > Hello, Well, I am kind of learning something new with every submission, the MODPY_DEFAULT_VERSION_3 was new to me and as you've spoted I guess that was a good example on how to break things up. Another change I was refering was to finally have setup PORTS_PRIVSEP=yes.
> Above diff actually breaks your legit update because the flavor used in > its dependency list no longer exists. It does. I understand this now. > You probably only tested your already existing installation after > repackaging py-crayons, but you cannot have successfully tested the > legit update itself with this. Correct. :-/ > On the submission itself: Personally, I'm fine with importing new > python ports as Python 3 only, but that makes for an ugly situation > where python ports become a wild mix of flavored and Python X.Y only as > nicely demonstrated above. :o) Yes... true. It did also felt like that was ok for an import but I didn't see the rest coming. Now switching all DEPENDS felt like a ton of updates so I don't know if we want to go that route. > I don't know how we want to handle this situation, but it would be > better to find consensus and work toward one solution. Agreed. I will probably spin-off a dedicated email thread to see if one solution could be agreed. PS: devel/legit thread: https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=157866485720815&w=2 Thanks, -- clematis (0x7e96fd2400fe7b59)
