On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 01:58:44PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > I'd kind-of expect a package named 'coreboot' to install something that > actually contains coreboot, rather than tools to work with it. That's a fair point, maybe I can be more creative.
> Had you considered just adding the other ports as RUN_DEPENDS to > coreboot-utils? They aren't necessary dependencies, but somebody using > coreboot-utils probably wants to have the other ports too.. Yes, but eventually that seemed misplaced; I'd also consider something like sysutils/uefitool (which pulls in Qt) to be part of such a meta package, coreboot-utils on the other side is really small and I'd like to consider it more standalone.