On Thu, Dec 12 2019, "f.holop" <min...@obiit.org> wrote:
> Landry Breuil - Thu, 12 December 2019 at 08:51:49
>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 01:47:25AM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>> > 
>> > +cc maintainer
>> > 
>> > This has bugged me for some time, I think enabling ICU makes sense.
>> > Here's a wip diff.  I fear it might cause issues with existing
>> > databases.  Real world tests would probably help.
>> 
>> I doubt it can have side effects on existing databases as they all have
>> a locale (and potential collations) configured during initdb, and adding
>> the possibility to use more locales/collations shouldnt affect existing
>> ones. Of course, to be tested in the real world :)
>
> initdb just sets "default" collation/ctype for `template1`.  when
> collation/ctype needs to be different, `CREATE DATABASE` must use the
> template `template0`.
>
> Collation cannot be changed on a database after it has been created as
> it affects the index creation as well.

Can you actually use ICU as the default collation algorithm used by
a database?

Sadly using ICU doesn't seem to be the silver bullet I was hoping for.
postgres on Linux distros still defaults to the libc collation backend.
You can't just push a button so that ICU is used by default[0].

[0] 
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/3366.1498183854%40sss.pgh.pa.us#3366.1498183...@sss.pgh.pa.us

So right now it seems that adding ICU might help a few users who can
tweak their schemas for their specific needs.  That's much less
interesting than what I expected.

-- 
jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF  DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE

Reply via email to