"Theo de Raadt" <dera...@openbsd.org> wrote: > I'll add my voice to this. > > The powerful vendors writing new languages must expand their breath, > or face the consequences that some software is not going to get written > in their languages. Better is very much muted by unportable.
What about gccgo? It supports more architectures than the standard Go compiler, is written and maintained by one of the core developers of the language and exists since the inception of Go[1]. (Note: I only learned about the existence of the different compilers last night when I was researching a bit and evaluating whether or not I should try Go) [1] https://commandcenter.blogspot.com/2017/09/go-ten-years-and-climbing.html
