Hi Stuart, On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 10:34:52AM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > If it turns out we need libluv for things other than neovim, then that's > probably the simplest way (different directories rather than filenames > usually make it easier to point other ports at the right one) - but > for now this feels like a sane approach.
So do I read it correctly that we should continue using the bundled luv until another port needs it too? Or do we bite the bullet and just do the luv port form the outset? Thanks -- Best Regards Edd Barrett http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
