Re the first submission you pointed out, here is the comment:

- programmable MUD client, but beta rather than stable

This doesn't sound like something we want in ports.

(Also in general, new ports are always trickier because there's a policy of always needing a second developer ok to commit them, so you need to get two dev's interested in it!)


Second one: diff please! Don't forget the REVISION bump.

--
Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting.

On 28 September 2019 06:15:12 Andras Farkas <deepbluemist...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 3:34 PM Chris Bennett
<cpb_po...@bennettconstruction.us> wrote:
Port something.
Last time I ported something I got no reply and gave up.
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=148150979321732&w=2
Update something.
Similar story there:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=156583823801955&w=2
https://cvsweb.openbsd.org/ports/math/hoc/

I'd be willing to try again, though.



Reply via email to