Landry Breuil <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm suggesting that ignoring the technical, and focusing on the > > political, being expedient at "reduction of patches", and bending over > > backwards to please Mozilla people who don't understand unveil/pledge, > > has caused harm here. It is turning a serious attempt at security > > feature into security theater. > > Feel free to correct my mistakes there then, or find someone to do so. > I'm done working on those diffs.
I attempted to correct a mistake, by explaining how the decision to store the unveil/pledge configuration in userspace was pushing jcs's strong security design into a security theater. But you said Mozilla demanded it, and said you won't act against them. So once again, I attempted to correct the mistake, as I have interpreted that Mozilla's guidance in that direction is due to YOUR misguiding Mozilla people in that direction, ignoring the technical! And your reaction to that is "I'm done"? And all through this you say you don't care about the technical? Very strange.
