On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 01:36:15PM +0200, Caspar Schutijser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 08:10:03PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > Bah, spoke too fast, we have pyqt 5.9 because qt 5.9. Still py-sip is
> > lagging behind a bit :)
>
> landry@ recently updated the py-sip port (thank you!). So with that
> out of the way, I hope we can look at updating editors/{,py-}qscintilla
> again. In the meantime, a new version was released so I updated the
> diff. I performed the same amount of testing as last time, to repeat:
>
> I build-tested the following ports that depend on {,py-}qscintilla:
> cad/openscad
> databases/sqliteman
> geo/qgis
> x11/kde4/p5-qt
> x11/kde4/qyoto
> x11/kde4/ruby-qt
> x11/kde4/smokeqt
>
> In the case of the ports below, I did not only build-test them, I also
> performed some run-time testing:
> databases/sqlitebrowser
> devel/tortoisehg
> math/octave (very light testing)
>
> Feedback is appreciated.
On the diff itself, dependency between py- and the lib should be
enforced, otherwise you get this:
Error: QScintilla 2.10.1 is being used but the Python bindings 2.11.2
are being built. Please use matching versions.
LIB_DEPENDS = editors/qscintilla,qt5>=2.11.2 (and its equivalent for the
default FLAVOR, and maybe even = and not >= ) in py-qscintilla Makefile
does the trick.
Landry
