On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 09:44:51PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2019/07/02 21:48, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 07:02:04PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 12:21:50PM -0400, Daniel Jakots wrote: > > > > I think it would be indeed nice to provide a way for people to easily > > > > see the content of the ports tree without having to take the sqlite3 db > > > > out from sqlports.tgz. > > > > > > > > Regarding the JSON, I think only one, with as much info as > > > > possible with avoiding bloat, should be provided. And they should have > > > > the field names ;) > > > > > > as for repology, in the meantime i've hacked my way to extract > > > ports-INDEX from portslist package in > > > http://ftp.fr.openbsd.org/pub/ports-INDEX to hopefully fix > > > https://github.com/repology/repology/issues/149, because right now it's > > > showing misleading info. > > "That's the best I can do in the current situation." -> well, removing > OpenBSD from the list would be better than that... Surely with the amount > of parsing they're doing they noticed the old INDEX file in cvs was junk > with duplicate entries etc anyway?
Those guys just don't want to be bothered. We don't matter enough for them to do some decent job out of it.
