Hi Ampie,

Thanks a lot for the report ! Did anyone had the opportunity to test on sparc64 
or ppc ?

BR,Jerome

From: Ampie Niemand
Sent: mardi 7 mai 2019 11:54
To: Neon King
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [New][CAD] Solvespace, a 2D/3D parametric CAD designer

Virtualbox OpenBSD-current box
Arch: i386
Builds perfectly fine and runs great under standard window manager.

Notes attached

Regards
Ampie

On Sun, 5 May 2019 at 23:32, Neon King <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >Hi Jerome --
>
> Hi brian !
>
> >On 5/4/19 2:57 PM, Neon King wrote:
> >> Hi everyone,
> >> I'm happy to share my first real submission to ports@
> >>
> >> As FreeCAD was standing in ports-wip for a while , i decided
> >> to port a less-bloated alternative for 2D/3D parametric CAD.
> >>
> >> Original project stands at https://github.com/solvespace/solvespace
> >> Last release (2.3) happened in 2016 so i decided to base upon
> >> commit e7b75f19c34c923780db776592b47152650d8f22 .
> >>
> >> I had issues with the current maintainer who's a linux/git addict and
> >> which compilation instructions were not that right and made to piss
> >> me off (hi whitequark!)
> >>
> >> Build instructions are based on "git submodule" fetching, so i
> >> decided to embed external dependencies (libdxfrw, q3d and
> >> flatbuffers) as they are not present in the port tree and to make
> >> my life easier.
> >>
> >> I had to patch the original CMakeLists.txt so i included it in my
> >> archive modified. There were also tests but the testsuite
> >> executable encountered errors that seemed to me to be
> >> linux-related (i might be wrong) so i excluded the tests from
> >> the archive to make it lighter and save compilation time.
> >>
> >> Original CMakeLists.txt also checked for a xgettext dependency
> >> but make port-lib-depends-check and portcheck were happy
> >> without and related possible issues didn't show up.
> >> I'm likely to fork that project at some point so i won't take
> >> maintainership.
> >>
> >> Hope you will like it :)
> >>
> >> Thousands of thanks to solene@, thfr@ and bcallah@ for
> >> driving me through this effort
> >>
> >> Have a good weekend,
> >> Jerome KASPER
>
> >Attached is a nicer version of the port.
>
> Feels more correct that way. Still runs fine for me on amd64. Thanks
> to ninja the cmake build goes fine. If anyone willing to test/ok this
> i’ll be super happy :)
>
> >~Brian
> BR, Jerome
>

Reply via email to