On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 00:11:59 -0400, Kurt Mosiejczuk <k...@cranky.work>
wrote:
> While I'm here, I figure I'll take maintainer unless someone has an
> objection.
You should get it in a bulk next time, instead of just caring about one
category. Because it will end up in a bulk anyway and providing fixes
at the same time of the update is obviously better for everyone.
This port is quite critical so I'm not sure how worth it is to have a
maintainer setup there (the same logic happens with youtube-dl where
there's a maintainer and it's often ignored).
Last point, when I updated it sthen@ asked me to bump in python.port.mk
# The setuptools module provides a package locator (site.py) that is
# required at runtime for the pkg_resources stuff to work
MODPY_SETUPUTILS_DEPEND ?= devel/py-setuptools${MODPY_FLAVOR}>=39.0.1v0
because then you don't have to bump every port. It hasn't been done
during previous update but I think it should still be done.
