On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 11:31:09AM +0200, Manolis Tzanidakis wrote:
> Hello ports,
> here is diff to update p5-DBD-Pg to 3.7.4. This also bumps the required
> version of p5-DBI to 1.614 as stated in the project's changelog in
> version 3.0.0: https://metacpan.org/changes/distribution/DBD-Pg#L321
> 
> Maintainer CC'd, as well.

OK afresh1@

Will give the maintainer a bit longer to timeout before I commit, but if
someone else wants to commit it that's fine too.


> All tests successful.
> Files=16, Tests=2131, 24 wallclock secs ( 0.30 usr  0.16 sys +  5.19
> cusr  1.22 csys =  6.87 CPU)
> Result: PASS
> 
> 
> Index: Makefile
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/databases/p5-DBD-Pg/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.72
> diff -u -p -r1.72 Makefile
> --- Makefile  20 Mar 2016 19:56:10 -0000      1.72
> +++ Makefile  21 Feb 2019 09:25:44 -0000
> @@ -3,11 +3,11 @@
>  COMMENT=     access to PostgreSQL databases through the DBI
>  
>  MODULES=     cpan databases/postgresql
> -DISTNAME=    DBD-Pg-3.5.3
> +DISTNAME=    DBD-Pg-3.7.4
>  CATEGORIES=  databases
>  
>  LIB_DEPENDS= databases/postgresql
> -RUN_DEPENDS= databases/p5-DBI>=1.52
> +RUN_DEPENDS= databases/p5-DBI>=1.614
>  BUILD_DEPENDS=       ${RUN_DEPENDS}
>  TEST_DEPENDS=        devel/p5-Test-Warn
>  
> Index: distinfo
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/databases/p5-DBD-Pg/distinfo,v
> retrieving revision 1.24
> diff -u -p -r1.24 distinfo
> --- distinfo  30 Oct 2015 16:20:11 -0000      1.24
> +++ distinfo  21 Feb 2019 09:25:44 -0000
> @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
> -SHA256 (DBD-Pg-3.5.3.tar.gz) = fpipuXUlakcz2xwOl0ytWtXLghSJMj45Xtl70FjgqQ4=
> -SIZE (DBD-Pg-3.5.3.tar.gz) = 256570
> +SHA256 (DBD-Pg-3.7.4.tar.gz) = n/qcTp0daxSD7DJZEUuVmY/X5KQWiTHJA7WtX9emeD4=
> +SIZE (DBD-Pg-3.7.4.tar.gz) = 261212
> 

-- 
andrew - http://afresh1.com

People who invent random theories which only defend the vendor must have
been beaten as children.  Beaten with sticks.
At least, that's my theory.
                      -- Theo De Raadt

Reply via email to