Any dev willing to OK this? https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=154965459115588&w=2 (As it switches upstream and uses EPOCH I would appreciate another pair of eyes).
I've got a positive test report so far and have been running this pledged version since a few days without problems. On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 08:34:00PM +0100, Ingo Feinerer wrote: > Here is a diff that switches lemonbar to the krypt-n/bar fork supporting > XFT. A tarball is attached for two patches (I wanted to avoid `cvs add` > on the patches directory). The inline diff just shows the changes to the > Makefile and distinfo. > > At the same time add pledge() before the main processing loop. It is > nice to see that "stdio" is enough at this point (after initialization > which needed at least "rpath" is my tests; likely for loading some > fonts). > > Alternatively we could create a new port for the fork (e.g., > lemonbar-xft). But since both LemonBoy/bar and krypt-n/bar have not seen > a lot of changes recently we won't miss anything important if we just > switch. > > So OK for the switch?
