Maybe the REVISION bump is not needed.
Given that It doesn't affect the package.
Cheers.
Elias.
2018-08-24 2:11 GMT-03:00 Elias M. Mariani <marianiel...@gmail.com>:
> I was running the test from the ${WRKSRC} directory, that seemed to be
> the problem.
> Attached a REVISION.
> With test, using TEST_IS_INTERACTIVE = X11.
>
> Cheers.
> Elias.
>
> 2018-08-23 18:26 GMT-03:00 Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org>:
>> On 2018/08/23 17:48, Elias M. Mariani wrote:
>>> Thanks Stuart.
>>> How did you run the tests?
>>> I tried and got errors using py-test-cov and runtests.py or "Ran 0
>>> tests" using the default.
>>
>> Installed py-qt5 and did this:
>>
>> $ cd qtpy/tests
>> $ py.test
>> ================================================ test session starts
>> =================================================
>> platform openbsd6 -- Python 2.7.15, pytest-3.5.0, py-1.5.3, pluggy-0.6.0
>>
>> PyQt4: unknown version
>> PyQt5: PyQt: 5.9 - Qt: 5.9.6
>> PySide: not installed
>> PySide2: not installed
>>
>> rootdir: /usr/obj/ports/py-qtpy-1.4.2/QtPy-1.4.2, inifile:
>> collected 19 items
>>
>> test_main.py .
>> [ 5%]
>> test_patch_qcombobox.py .. [ 15%]
>> test_patch_qheaderview.py . [ 21%]
>> test_qdesktopservice_split.py ..s [ 36%]
>> test_qtcore.py . [ 42%]
>> test_qtdesigner.py . [ 47%]
>> test_qthelp.py . [ 52%]
>> test_qtmultimedia.py . [ 57%]
>> test_qtnetwork.py . [ 63%]
>> test_qtprintsupport.py . [ 68%]
>> test_qtsql.py . [ 73%]
>> test_qtsvg.py . [ 78%]
>> test_qttest.py . [ 84%]
>> test_uic.py ... [100%]
>>
>> ============================== warnings summary
>> ==============================
>> None
>> could not create cache path
>> /usr/obj/ports/py-qtpy-1.4.2/QtPy-1.4.2/.pytest_cache/v/cache/nodeids
>>
>> -- Docs: http://doc.pytest.org/en/latest/warnings.html
>> ============== 18 passed, 1 skipped, 1 warnings in 1.40 seconds
>> ==============
>>
>> (And similar with py.test-3 for the py3 version).
>>
