On 2018/06/12 21:26, mitchell wodach wrote: > On 6/9/18, Marc Espie <es...@nerim.net> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 06:15:01PM -0500, mitchell wodach wrote: > >> Hi > >> > >> I'm working on porting Freedink. I have the data separate form the game > >> code. > >> The data has multiple licenses. so for PERMIT_PACKAGE in Makefile I > >> should > >> pick the most restrictive license? > > > > What you're saying is highly ambiguous: do the individual data files have > > separate licences ? In that case, the most restrictive is appropriate. > > > > Or do you see several licences that apply to all files ? In that case, > > this means the data can be redistributed under any of the licences. In that > > case, the least restrictive is appropriate. > > > > I do apologize for the ambiguity of my question. not the greatest > question asker. > I took a look in the upstream source tarball for the data. the files > do have their own separate licences. most of the data is licensed > under zlib. The files that are not under the zlib license are > specified in a separate readme file and have a folder with all the > license texts. so the first case is the one I need to pick. I guess I > have some reading todo lol! > > Thanks, > Mitch >
Got a link to the actual distfiles you're looking at?
