On Sat, Jun 09 2018, Klemens Nanni <k...@openbsd.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 11:55:45PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>> I'd prefer:
>>
>> if [ "$$REPLY" != N ]; then \
>>
>> so that by default we keep the current behavior. I think it's good to
>> push people to check patch comments that might not be accurate any more.
> Fair point.
>
> I went for 'n' so the capital yes equivalent indicates the default reply.
ok jca@
> Index: bsd.port.mk
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk,v
> retrieving revision 1.1414
> diff -u -p -r1.1414 bsd.port.mk
> --- bsd.port.mk 4 Jun 2018 06:14:56 -0000 1.1414
> +++ bsd.port.mk 8 Jun 2018 22:30:32 -0000
> @@ -2362,11 +2362,12 @@ update-patches:
> PATCH_LIST='${PATCH_LIST}' DIFF_ARGS='${DIFF_ARGS}' \
> DISTORIG=${DISTORIG} PATCHORIG=${PATCHORIG} \
> ${_PERLSCRIPT}/update-patches`; \
> - case $$toedit in "");; \
> - *) read i?'edit patches: '; \
> - cd ${PATCHDIR} && $${VISUAL:-$${EDITOR:-/usr/bin/vi}} $$toedit;; esac
> -
> -
> + if [ -n "$$toedit" ]; then \
> + read -r REPLY?'edit patches? [Yn]: '; \
> + if [ "$$REPLY" != n ]; then \
> + cd ${PATCHDIR} && $${VISUAL:-$${EDITOR:-/usr/bin/vi}}
> $$toedit; \
> + fi; \
> + fi
>
> .endif # IGNORECMD
>
>
--
jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
