On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 07:04:46PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > On Wed, May 30 2018, kwesterb...@gmail.com wrote: > >> On May 30, 2018, at 7:55 AM, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas <j...@wxcvbn.org> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> On Tue, May 29 2018, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas <j...@wxcvbn.org> wrote: > >>> So emacs-26.1 has been released yesterday: > >>> > >>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2018-05/msg00765.html > >>> > >>> I doubt that this update addresses the bug encountered by Gr??goire, > >>> Piotr and Manuel, but I don't think it will make it worse. > >>> > >>> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=29170 > >>> > >>> I have only built and tested this on amd64 so far, I'll handle armv7 > >>> and sparc64 later. People running different archs and/or one of the > >>> graphical flavors, your test reports are welcome! > >> > >> I could have mentioned that I intend to commit this soon. oks welcome too. > >> > >> -- > >> jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE > >> > > > > Unfortunately my ports building setup has gotten into state where it's > > taking > 3days to get to emacs. :-(. > > Looks like you're not the only one who sees an increase in build time. > Anyway, you don't need to rebuild everything from scratch, and emacs > itself is relatively quick to build. > > > But assuming this diff doesn't do > > anything more than the rc1 diff I've been running for a while (gtk3, > > amd64) then ok krw@ > > Not too many changes in the code but lots of lines moved, still: > > ritchie /tmp$ wc -l emacs-26.1-rc1-to-emacs-26.1-tarball.diff > 12435 emacs-26.1-rc1-to-emacs-26.1-tarball.diff > > ~jca/tmp/emacs-26.1-rc1-to-emacs-26.1-tarball.diff.gz if you want to > take a look. > > -- > jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
More fun than I anticipated getting enough ports compiled that emacs could compile. Including forgetting to use your latest diff at least once. :-) Once I got that far compiling the gtk+3 version went without incident and the resulting port works at least as well as the RC1 version. i.e. nothing breaks in usage case. so ok krw@ fwiw. .... Ken
