Hi,
Am Donnerstag, Mai 03, 2018 16:27 CEST, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> 
schrieb:

> On 2018/05/03 15:54, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am Freitag, April 27, 2018 13:58 CEST, Pavel Korovin <p...@tristero.se> 
> > schrieb:
> >
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > Please find updates for
> > >     sysutils/logstash
> > >     textproc/elasticsearch
> > >     www/kibana
> > > and new sysutils/x-pack port attached.
> >
> >
> > I installed/updated all but the x-pack, but I still don't get logstash 
> > starting up with beats plugin with SSL enabled,
> > seems I still hit: 
> > https://github.com/logstash-plugins/logstash-input-beats/issues/188
>
> "still" -> sounds like this isn't any worse with the updates?

with the current logstash 2.4.0, I can setup SSL between filebeat and logstash.
The "still" refers to other intermediate versions I tried from the 5.x logstash 
series.

>
> > Here's my beats input config snippet, otherwise, using more or less the 
> > defaults that the updated package installs:
> >
> > cat /etc/logstash/conf.d/filebeat.yml                                       
> >                                                                             
> >                                                          
> > input {
> >   beats {
> >     host => "127.0.0.1"
> >     port => 12364
> >     ssl => true
> >     ssl_certificate => "/etc/logstash/logstash.crt"
> >     ssl_key => "/etc/logstash/logstash.key"
> >     ssl_certificate_authorities => [ "/etc/logstash/logstash-ca.crt" ]
> >     ssl_verify_mode => "force_peer"
> >     cipher_suites => [ 'TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA' ]
> >     # cipher_suites => [ 'TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256' ]
> >   }
> > }
> > ...
> >
> >
> > I tried to play with different ciphers, but to no avail. Some more info I 
> > added to the issue mentioned above.
> > But maybe I'm missing something obvious, so if someone gets the beats input 
> > to work with SSL I'm all ears
>
> I'm not using any of this stuff, but could this be as simple as having
> to build OpenBSD .so files for netty-tcnative (similar to what I'm having
> to do for snappy-java with net/unifi)?
>
I checked what you did there, and that might work.

A quick try building netty-tcnactive following instructions here:
 http://netty.io/wiki/forked-tomcat-native.html#building-on-linux

It failed on me like this:

however, it quickly fails like this for me:
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO]
[INFO] Netty/TomcatNative [Parent] 2.0.9.Final-SNAPSHOT ... SUCCESS [ 29.771 s]
[INFO] Netty/TomcatNative [OpenSSL - Dynamic] ............. FAILURE [  9.080 s]
[INFO] Netty/TomcatNative [OpenSSL - Static] .............. SKIPPED
[INFO] Netty/TomcatNative [BoringSSL - Static] ............ SKIPPED
[INFO] Netty/TomcatNative [LibreSSL - Static] 2.0.9.Final-SNAPSHOT SKIPPED
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 44.556 s
[INFO] Finished at: 2018-05-04T14:47:03+02:00
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal 
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.1:compile (default-compile) on 
project netty-tcnative: Compilation failure -> [Help 1]
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.LifecycleExecutionException: Failed to execute goal 
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.1:compile (default-compile) on 
project netty-tcnative: Compilation failure
    at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor.execute 
(MojoExecutor.java:213)
    at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor.execute 
(MojoExecutor.java:154)
    at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor.execute 
(MojoExecutor.java:146)
....

and I'm lost here, that doesn't tell me anything. My Maven/java knowledge is 
rather limited.
However, when it even would come to build boringssl-static,I guess the 
boringssl-static/pom.xml might need
some tweaks as well, adding some OpenBSD target.

Sebastian

Reply via email to