Theo Buehler writes: > +- (uchar**) &select_limit, 0, GET_ULONG, REQUIRED_ARG, 1000L, 1, ~0L, 0, 1 > , 0}, > ++ (uchar**) &select_limit, 0, GET_ULONG, REQUIRED_ARG, 1000L, 1, static_ca > st<ulonglong>(~0L), 0, 1, 0},
Would it make sense to use ~0ULL instead?
