On 2018/04/04 09:18, Marc Espie wrote: > > First, your subject is misleading, you're talking about the port, > not the package. > On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 10:31:47PM -0400, sven falempin wrote: > > Fresh out of the box. > > > Builds here.
I've never had problems with this in bulk builds. I think it's a bit more likely there is something present locally causing a problem than an issue with the port. > > /usr/ports/pobj/subversion-1.9.7/subversion-1.9.7/subversion/bindings/swig/proxy/svn_client_h.swg:196: > > Error: Couldn't find 'proxy.py'. > > /usr/ports/pobj/subversion-1.9.7/subversion-1.9.7/subversion/bindings/swig/proxy/svn_client_h.swg:197: > > Error: Couldn't find 'proxy.py'. > > Unable to open file subversion/bindings/swig/python/svn_client.c: Too > > many open files > > *** Error 1 in /usr/ports/pobj/subversion-1.9.7/subversion-1.9.7 > > (./build-outputs.mk:286 > > 'subversion/bindings/swig/python/svn_client.c') > > *** Error 1 in . (Makefile:224 'post-build') > > > > Given the large amount of _Couldn't find 'proxy.py'_ > > i guess allowing more fd would be a terrible idea. > > > > the problem starts with : > > It probably starts earlier. This looks like a hidden dependency to me. > > > /usr/ports/pobj/subversion-1.9.7/subversion-1.9.7/subversion/include/svn_version.h:148: > > Warning 302: Identifier 'svn_version_t' redefined (ignored), > > /usr/ports/pobj/subversion-1.9.7/subversion-1.9.7/subversion/bindings/swig/proxy/svn_types_h.swg:47: > > Warning 302: previous definition of 'svn_version_t'. > > /usr/ports/pobj/subversion-1.9.7/subversion-1.9.7/subversion/include/svn_props.h:504: > > Warning 305: Bad constant value (ignored). > > /usr/ports/pobj/subversion-1.9.7/subversion-1.9.7/subversion/include/svn_props.h:652: > > Warning 305: Bad constant value (ignored). > > > > I update to -rOPENBSD_6_3 after uncompressing, reproduced > > You probably have stuff installed that isn't properly configured out > properly. with --disable or something. > > (python ? swig ? I don't know). > > > You didn't actually provide relevant info (the stuff scrolling by in the > configure part), so I don't have stuff to diff... > > I could look, but I'm lazy and this is actually an incomplete report. > Full build log please, but first make sure you don't have old versions of things lying around. Is there any particular reason for building from source anyway?
