On 2018/03/31 12:07, Roman Kravchuk wrote: > Index: patches/patch-src_modules_tls_tls_locking_c > =================================================================== > RCS file: > /cvs/ports/telephony/kamailio/patches/patch-src_modules_tls_tls_locking_c,v > retrieving revision 1.1 > diff -u -p -u -p -r1.1 patch-src_modules_tls_tls_locking_c > --- patches/patch-src_modules_tls_tls_locking_c 21 Sep 2017 09:34:32 > -0000 1.1 > +++ patches/patch-src_modules_tls_tls_locking_c 31 Mar 2018 09:00:39 > -0000 > @@ -3,21 +3,43 @@ $OpenBSD: patch-src_modules_tls_tls_lock > Index: src/modules/tls/tls_locking.c > --- src/modules/tls/tls_locking.c.orig > +++ src/modules/tls/tls_locking.c > -@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ static int n_static_locks=0; > +@@ -33,7 +33,8 @@ static int n_static_locks=0; > static gen_lock_set_t* static_locks=0; > > /* OpenSSL is thread-safe since 1.1.0 */ > --#if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER < 0x10100000L > -+#if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER < 0x10100000L || defined(LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER) > +-#if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER < 0x10100000L || defined(LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER) > ++#if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER < 0x10100000L || \ > ++ (defined(LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER) && LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER < > 0x2070000fL)
I would like if somebody who is familiar with the current status of thread safety in libressl could chime in. Either have a look at this (suggested only if you own peril-sensitive sunglasses...) or explain what does/doesn't need locking as I'm not too sure of how things ended up after the pledge fixes.
