On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 06:00:24PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > On Sat, Jan 20 2018, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote: > > [...] > > > How about making the cmake debug-build stuff dependent on a > > flavour (like "CMAKE_DEBUG") rather than making DEBUG do > > double-duty as a compiler flag option *and* a cmake knob? > > > > (We already removed some other cases where DEBUG turned on > > port-specific debug options..) > > Looks like several people agree with this direction, so here's a diff > that adds MODCMAKE_DEBUG. > > Comments/oks? > > > Index: share/man/man5/port-modules.5 > =================================================================== > RCS file: /d/cvs/src/share/man/man5/port-modules.5,v > retrieving revision 1.225 > diff -u -p -r1.225 port-modules.5 > --- share/man/man5/port-modules.5 2 Dec 2017 09:31:52 -0000 1.225 > +++ share/man/man5/port-modules.5 21 Jan 2018 16:58:03 -0000 > @@ -569,6 +569,13 @@ If set to `Yes', CMake will print detail > stages about exact command being run, etc. > Should not be used in ports Makefiles. > Default value is `Yes'. > +.It MODCMAKE_DEBUG > +If set to `Yes', CMake will produce a debug build instead of a release > +build. > +The exact effects on the build process depend on settings specified in > +the CMake config files. > +Also files in the resulting package might named differently.
missing verb ? And i think, since ppl wont understand what it means....
