ping ? :-) On 23 November 2017 at 08:33, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote:
> On 2017/11/23 08:43, Giovanni Bechis wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 07:24:08PM +0000, David CARLIER wrote: > > > On 22 November 2017 at 16:28, Giovanni Bechis <giova...@paclan.it> > wrote: > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 09:13:43AM +0000, David CARLIER wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > here a proposal to update to 2.4.29, removing some patches > LIBRESSL's > > > > > related pushed upstream in the process. > > > > > > > > > not all of them has been pushed, ad least mod_ssl.c is missing one, > > > > I haven't looked at all patches yet. > > > > > > > > > > > You sure ? For example in this version > > > > > yep: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > $ cd $(make show=WRKSRC) > > $ grep -nHA4 OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER modules/ssl/mod_ssl.c > > modules/ssl/mod_ssl.c:340:#if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x1000200fL > > modules/ssl/mod_ssl.c-341-#ifndef OPENSSL_NO_COMP > > modules/ssl/mod_ssl.c-342- SSL_COMP_free_compression_methods(); > > modules/ssl/mod_ssl.c-343-#endif > > modules/ssl/mod_ssl.c-344-#endif > > That one is ok, we define OPENSSL_NO_COMP. I haven't checked the others. >
