On Wed, December 6, 2017 11:34, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06 2017, "Kirill Bychkov" <ki...@linklevel.net> wrote:
>> On Wed, December 6, 2017 03:23, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>>> On Sun, Dec 03 2017, "Kirill Bychkov" <ki...@linklevel.net> wrote:
>>>> Hi!
>>>> This patch enables build of libraw on other gcc4 arches, not only arm.
>>>> Tested on macppc.
>>>> OK?
>>>
>>> This looks heavy-handed to me, why extend this to all non-clang archs,
>>> afaik base-gcc has support for 4-bytes atomics on powerpc.  How does the
>>> build fail exactly?
>>
>> Without patch I see
>> ===>  libraw-0.18.5   is only for aarch64 amd64 i386 arm, not powerpc
>> (macppc) .
>> MODGCC4_ARCHS = arm somehow overrides ONLY_FOR_ARCHES:
>>
>> make show=ONLY_FOR_ARCHS
>> aarch64 amd64 i386 arm
>>
>> With patch:
>> make show=ONLY_FOR_ARCHS
>> aarch64 amd64 i386 amd64 arm hppa i386 mips64 mips64el powerpc sparc64
>>
>> Switching MODULES=gcc4 to COMPILER=gcc made libraw unavailable on most
>> arches.
>> See
>> http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/graphics/libraw/Makefile.diff?r1=1.24&r2=1.25
>
> ok, thanks for confirming.
>
>> Better patch:
>>
>> Index: Makefile
>> ===================================================================
>> RCS file: /cvs/ports/graphics/libraw/Makefile,v
>> retrieving revision 1.29
>> diff -u -p -u -r1.29 Makefile
>> --- Makefile    16 Nov 2017 23:20:39 -0000      1.29
>> +++ Makefile    6 Dec 2017 08:13:27 -0000
>> @@ -22,9 +22,10 @@ WANTLIB += c jasper jpeg lcms2 m pthread
>>
>>  MASTER_SITES =         https://www.libraw.org/data/
>>
>> -COMPILER =             base-clang ports-gcc
>>  # for atomic builtins (__sync_fetch_and_add_4)
>> -MODGCC4_ARCHS =                arm
>> +.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "arm"
>> +COMPILER = base-clang ports-gcc
>> +.endif
>
> I guess it's fine, but isn't the shortest fix to add "base-gcc" at the
> end of COMPILER?

macppc is quite happy with base-gcc, so it should be before ports-gcc. And
for arm ports-gcc is the only solution I suppose (have no hw to test).
So I see no other way to deal with arm other than this.



Reply via email to