On Sun, November 12, 2017 20:12, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 11:49:20AM -0500, Brian Callahan wrote:
>> devel/luabitop is a BDEP of editors/neovim. devel/lua-bitop is not used by
>> anything (at least, as far as `make search key=lua-bitop` suggests).
>> devel/luabitop also appears to be the more comprehensive port.
>>
>> OK to remove devel/lua-bitop?
>
> Ugh. IIRC, I imported lua-bitop for neovim, probably missing luabitop
> becuase it wasn't prefixed 'lua-'. Somehow I then managed to depend on
> the existing luabitop.
>
> I've checked using sqlports that there are no other dependents, so your
> plan seems sensible to me. OK edd@, but perhaps wait a bit and see if
> anyone else chimes in.
>
> Thanks
>
Hi!
lua- prefix is a standard. IMHO you should remove luabitop and add lua-bitop
as a dependency to neovim.
Just my 2 cents.
