On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 05:15:08PM +0100, Steven Mestdagh wrote:
> update after blas update, a rerolled distfile, and also use gfortran.

I can't get this to build. Using dpb with blas, cblas and lapack
patches. Am I missing something?


>>> Building on localhost under math/cblas
         BDEPENDS = 
[math/blas;lang/gcc/4.9;lang/gcc/4.9,-f95;lang/gcc/4.9,-libs]
         DIST = [math/cblas:cblas-1.0/cblas.tgz]
         FULLPKGNAME = cblas-1.0p4
         RDEPENDS = [lang/gcc/4.9,-libs;math/blas]
(Junk lock failure for localhost at 1509905768)
Received IO
(Junk lock obtained for localhost at 1509905775)
Woken up math/cblas
>>> Running depends in math/cblas at 1509905775
/usr/sbin/pkg_add -aI -Dunsigned -Drepair blas-3.7.1
was: /usr/sbin/pkg_add -aI -Dunsigned -Drepair blas-3.7.1 g95-4.9.4p6 
gcc-4.9.4p6 gcc-libs-4.9.4p6
/usr/sbin/pkg_add -aI -Dunsigned -Drepair blas-3.7.1
Collision in blas-1.0p8->3.7.1: the following files already exist
        /usr/local/man/cat3f/lsame.0 (lapack-3.1.1p5 and blas-3.7.1)
        /usr/local/man/cat3f/xerbla.0 (lapack-3.1.1p5 and blas-3.7.1)
Couldn't find updates for blas-1.0p8
>>> Running show-prepare-results in math/cblas at 1509905784
===> math/cblas
===> cblas-1.0p4 depends on: g95->=4.9.4p0,<4.10 -> g95-4.9.4p6
===> cblas-1.0p4 depends on: gcc->=4.9,<4.10 -> gcc-4.9.4p6
===> cblas-1.0p4 depends on: g95->=4.9,<4.10 -> g95-4.9.4p6
===> cblas-1.0p4 depends on: blas-* -> blas-1.0p8
===> cblas-1.0p4 depends on: gcc-libs->=4.9,<4.10 -> gcc-libs-4.9.4p6
===>  Verifying specs:  blas>=2.1 gfortran>=3 quadmath
Missing library for blas>=2.1
Fatal error
*** Error 1 in /usr/ports/math/cblas 
(/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2182 
'/usr/ports/pobj/cblas-1.0/.buildwantlibs')
*** Error 1 in /usr/ports/math/cblas 
(/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2425 'prepare')
===> Exiting math/cblas with an error
*** Error 1 in /home/bulibuta/wrk/obsd/src/ports 
(/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.subdir.mk:147 'show-prepare-results')
(Junk lock released for localhost at 1509905785)
Error: job failed with 256 on localhost

Reply via email to