On 2017/09/12 17:05, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 12 2017, Giovanni Bechis <giova...@paclan.it> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 09:42:35PM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> please find below a simple update diff for ninja. > >> > >> - add write_fake_manifests.py and measure.py to PLIST. > >> - add NO_TEST otherwise there is an error if run regress. > > added a do-test target to fix regression tests.
I'd be ok with adding those to the current port. > Hah, nice. > > > Cheers > > Giovanni > > > >> Tested with devel/kf5, graphics/opencv, graphics/krita on AMD64. > >> > >> Would like someone run a bulk with the diff below? > >> > >> Comments? Ok? > > Maybe obvious: we are approaching release and ninja is kinda critical, > so better watch out for regressions. Yep, so let's have an evaluation. What's in the update? Does it bring anything that is important to us that means we should have it before release? (I don't know about timescales but it's obviously getting close.) If not then I'd be happier waiting than doing an update of something like this which does really need bulk build testing.
