On May 21, 2017: 18:00, Daniel Jakots wrote:
On Sun, 21 May 2017 14:27:09 -0700, "Heppler, J. Scott"
<shep...@centurylink.net> wrote:
? ports/x11/tint2/patches
It looks like something is missing :)
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/x11/tint2/pkg/PLIST,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
diff -u -p -u -r1.1.1.1 PLIST
--- ports/x11/tint2/pkg/PLIST 11 Sep 2015 14:14:07
-0000 1.1.1.1 +++ ports/x11/tint2/pkg/PLIST 21 May 2017
21:12:38 -0000 @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
-@comment $OpenBSD: PLIST,v 1.1.1.1 2015/09/11 14:14:07 sthen Exp $
-@pkgpath x11/tint
+@comment $OpenBSD$
I think the @pkgpath must stay.
I'm glad to update this but I want to confirm the change. I submitted
the last x11/tint2 update and my memory is that the @pkgpath entry was
to provide seamless upgrades due to the name change tint -> tint2. My
understanding previously was that the @pkgpath entry would only be
necessary for 2 release cycles - the last upgrade was 20 months ago.
--
J. Scott Heppler
