Will Backman <bitge...@yahoo.com> writes:

> Hopefully I'm reporting this correctly, and in a helpful way.
> irc-2.10.3.1p0v0/usr/local/man/man8/ircd.8
> There is a duplicate "for" in a line.
>
> 149c149
> < or going for for repairs a lot it would make sense to start the \fIircd\fP
> ---
>> or going for repairs a lot it would make sense to start the \fIircd\fP

IMO this is the kind of things that is better solved upstream.  I do not
think that this double word is harmful for the reader's understanding.

Probably you should report this upstream, but is there an upstream left?

  http://www.irc.org/techie.html
  http://web.irc.org/mla/ircd-users/2008/threads.html
  http://ftp.irc.org/ftp/irc/org/irc2.11.2p3.tgz

-- 
jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF  DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE

Reply via email to