> On Feb 24, 2017, at 10:39 AM, Kenneth Westerback <kwesterb...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 at 10:15 Alexandr Shadchin <alexandr.shadc...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 09:13:42PM -0500, Daniel Dickman wrote:
>> > I have an update for coq from 8.4 to 8.6, but I'd like to get the easy
>> > bits in first:
>> > - switch from http to https
>> > - drop gettext module
>> > - regen WANTLIB
>> > - move MODULES up in the Makefile, following Makefile.template
>> >
>> > ok?
>> >
>> 
>> ok shadchin@
>> 
>> --
>> Alexandr Shadchin
>> 
> 
> Not being a coq user I don't have much useful to say on the details of this 
> change or the update to 8.6 per se.
> 
> But I keep thinking that the best strategy would be to leverage opam more, 
> and eliminate as many individual ports as possible. Of course the last time I 
> tried I think coq didn't install from opam. :-)

i'm not an opam expert but i think this makes more sense for ocaml modules than 
for applications that happen to be written in ocaml. i personally like the 
ports system where i can just pkg_add to get a pre-built binary for things like 
coq. but like i said, i'm not really expert enough to properly weigh in here so 
will leave that to others.


> 
> .... Ken 

Reply via email to