I just saw your using IO-Socket-Socks, that's been held back waiting for an update to perl 5.24
You need the update for IPv6 support. That's the point of the IO::Socket::IP update in perl 5.24 to bring in IPv6 support. I have done the update to IO-Socket-Socks and will be releasing, once my dpb run / tests have completed with perl 5.24. This has been tested, as much as I can, tests passed on amd64. This is the update for now.... Index: Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/net/p5-IO-Socket-Socks/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -p -r1.8 Makefile --- Makefile 20 Mar 2016 19:56:51 -0000 1.8 +++ Makefile 5 Feb 2017 14:29:58 -0000 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ COMMENT = create SOCKS v4/v5 client or server -DISTNAME = IO-Socket-Socks-0.65 +DISTNAME = IO-Socket-Socks-0.73 CATEGORIES = net CPAN_AUTHOR = OLEG Index: distinfo =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/net/p5-IO-Socket-Socks/distinfo,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -p -r1.5 distinfo --- distinfo 16 Oct 2014 12:54:21 -0000 1.5 +++ distinfo 5 Feb 2017 14:17:01 -0000 @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -SHA256 (IO-Socket-Socks-0.65.tar.gz) = DPo8pTuQCHh5+/qmtGaLlVqTmlnY9Aq7I8PCKGQY64k= -SIZE (IO-Socket-Socks-0.65.tar.gz) = 26271 +SHA256 (IO-Socket-Socks-0.73.tar.gz) = biZ4o1RN42bikWSgwtqpv7fdhc3b9RC38vQI6qMgaB8= +SIZE (IO-Socket-Socks-0.73.tar.gz) = 28116 On 02/06/17 03:59, Andrew Fresh wrote: > On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 01:36:03PM +0100, Mark Patruck wrote: >> After base has been updated to perl 5.24.1 and IO::Socket::IP is >>> =0.37 now, here is an update to www/p5-Mojo 7.23 >> >> List of changes: >> https://metacpan.org/changes/distribution/Mojolicious >> >> I'm not sure if the post-install stuff (introduced in v1.22) can >> be removed now as there shouldn't be any users out there with the >> test certificate under ${PREFIX}/${P5SITE}/Mojo/IOLoop/certs/. >> >> As it doesn't hurt, i kept it for now. > > I think if this version doesn't install it, it can be removed. That > said, I don't know the history of that post-install line, so it's hard > to know what problem it was solving. > > However, it does ship with these now, so yes, it seems like a noop, but > maybe just because it deletes the wrong thing? > > Mojolicious-7.23/lib/Mojo/IOLoop/resources/server.crt > Mojolicious-7.23/lib/Mojo/IOLoop/resources/server.key > > > >> # www/p5-Mojo 7.23 (tests pass) > > I wonder if we want to get more tests running. I don't think it's > possible to disable IPv6 anymore, or at least unsupported, so maybe add > the following to "unskip" tests? I'm unclear whether the earlier > defines are still needed, but these all pass for me. > > (I'm not convinced on the multiple MAKE_ENV lines, but I'm not really > that much a stickler for style here) > > === > > MAKE_ENV += TEST_IPV6=Yes > MAKE_ENV += TEST_TLS=Yes > MAKE_ENV += TEST_SUBPROCESS=Yes > > TEST_DEPENDS += net/p5-IO-Socket-Socks > MAKE_ENV += TEST_SOCKS=Yes > > # Don't test online > MAKE_ENV += TEST_ONLINE='' > > === > > > > >> Index: Makefile >> =================================================================== >> RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/p5-Mojo/Makefile,v >> retrieving revision 1.28 >> diff -u -p -r1.28 Makefile > <SNIP> >> # p5-Mojolicious-Plugin-TtRenderer 1.57 >> >> Index: Makefile >> =================================================================== >> RCS file: /cvs/ports/textproc/p5-Mojolicious-Plugin-TtRenderer/Makefile,v >> retrieving revision 1.5 >> diff -u -p -r1.5 Makefile > > This really confused > ftp -o- 'http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=148629821021395&q=raw' | patch -E > > Could you make sure patches are rooted in a relative directory, or at > least make a big note at the top? I would sure appreciate it. > > > > Tests do pass for Mojo and TtRenderer and they pass their tests and > p5-Mojo's reverse depends (TtRenderer doesn't seem to have any), so: > > OK afresh1@ on both, after a decision on removing the certs directory. > > (Either way on the additional tests, I just like to enable whatever I can) >
