On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:48:24PM +0100, Erling Westenvik wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 04:31:30PM -0600, Dutch Ingraham wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:51:45PM +0100, Uwe Werler wrote: > > > > > > > > > Am 31. Januar 2017 22:49:14 MEZ schrieb Edd Barrett > > > <e...@theunixzoo.co.uk>: > > > >On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:40:20PM -0300, Gonzalo L. Rodriguez wrote: > > > >> It uses insecure webkit and conformal/companyzero do no recommend its > > > >> use. > > > > > > > >If no one uses it, then goodbye xombrero! > > > > > > > >-- > > > >Best Regards > > > >Edd Barrett > > > > > > > >http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk > > > > > > > > > Mmh, I use it. For me the best browser around. > > > > I use it as well - its the only functional graphical browser that works > > on my old single-core, 2GB memory celeron. > > How about surf(1). Not tabbed, and cannot be used solely by keyboard, > but better rendering in general IMO. I use it now and then. It even > manages to load Facebook.
Thanks for the suggestion - I like the suckless stuff in general, and this box is already running dwm and dmenu from them. I think I tried this a couple of years ago and found it a little too "raw" for my purposes, but I may have to take another look.
