On 2017/01/23 17:14, Donovan Watteau wrote: > 2016-11-20 21:45 GMT+01:00 Donovan Watteau <tso...@gmail.com>: > > Hi, > > > > The next version of audio/cmus (2.8.0-rc0 at the moment) will require > > <stdatomic.h>. > > > > This doesn't exist in base, and the only place where I can find this > > is in clang, so my next cmus update would lose a bit of platform > > support. > > > > Newer versions of GCC in ports have C11 support, and better platform > > support than clang at the moment, but it looks like our packages don't > > provide stdatomic.h (although they do have libatomic). > > > > Is there any reason for this? > > > > Thanks. > > Bumping this, in case it might just be a missing line in a PLIST or > something like this. > > Thanks.
I don't know the answer about gcc. But you're likely to lose platform support by requiring 64-bit atomics anyway, so restricting to clang arches might not make so much difference..
