On 2017/01/22 22:46, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> writes: > > $ FLAVOR=lua53 make show=FULLPKGPATH-lua > > devel/libmpack,-lua,lua53 > > $ FLAVOR=lua53 make show=PKGNAMES > > libmpack-1.0.3 lua53-mpack-1.0.3-lua53 > ^^^^^^ > This doesn't look right, I expect "lua53-mpack-1.0.3", which is what
oops, why didn't I spot that... :/ > I get with Edd's tarball. I can't find a meaning for > "lua53-mpack-1.0.3-lua53": is it a lua53 FLAVOR of "lua53-mpack-1.0.3"? Edd's has the wrong pkgpath though. > > $ FLAVOR=lua53 make show=TEST_DEPENDS > > lua53-mpack-1.0.3-lua53:devel/libmpack,-lua,lua53 > ^^^^^^ Same here. > > The port looks fine, but I find all this FULLPKG-fu confusing. > Splitting the port would make things more readable IMHO. hmm, and that would make things a bit more sensible for building to support the multiple lua versions without having to re-build the whole thing. OK I have come round to that idea.
