Stuart Henderson: > The downside is that then everybody gets asked which curl package to use > when it gets installed as a dependency.. and I bet many people will choose > "full" when they don't need it (and unnecessarily pull in a bunch of other > libraries to the address space, and maybe also submit ports with a bunch of > junk WANTLIBs). At least using "gssapi" means people are slightly less > likely to choose it!
Why do we want a gssapi flavor to begin with? This started out as a question from a single user for some custom configuration. What's the use case? Who's going to maintain it? (I can compile it, but that's it.) -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
