On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 12:59:01 -0400, "trondd" <tro...@kagu-tsuchi.com>
wrote:

> The problem here is that I didn't have py-coverage installed.  They
> require a newer version than we have in ports.  I don't know if the
> newer one would be backwords compatible or not.  Can someone more
> experienced with Python ports help out here?  If I update
> py-coverage, what do I need to check for fallout?

Yeah, our py-coverage is lagging a bit. If you want to update it, you
should verify that ports that depend on it doesn't break. I can have a
look at it if you don't want to do the work.

The list:
  RUN_DEPENDS
/usr/ports/audio/py-discogs-client
/usr/ports/devel/py-nosexcover
/usr/ports/devel/py-nosexcover,python3
/usr/ports/devel/py-test-cov
/usr/ports/devel/py-test-cov,python3
  TEST_DEPENDS
/usr/ports/devel/py-nose
/usr/ports/devel/py-nose,python3
/usr/ports/devel/py-nosexcover
/usr/ports/devel/py-nosexcover,python3
/usr/ports/devel/py-smmap
/usr/ports/net/py-oauth2
/usr/ports/security/py-oauthlib
/usr/ports/security/py-oauthlib,python3
/usr/ports/textproc/cdiff
/usr/ports/textproc/py-polib
/usr/ports/www/py-beaker
/usr/ports/www/py-pylons
/usr/ports/www/py-routes
/usr/ports/www/py-webtest

Reply via email to