On 2016/09/15 22:10, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Aug 2016 21:21:07 +0100, Stuart Henderson
> <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote:
>
> > You have to bump them all because otherwise packaging will fail
> > (PLIST_DB). If you are going to this trouble anyway it is probably
> > worth looking at setting PKGSPEC for setuputils to reduce the need
> > for future bumps..
>
> So I'm looking again at this update.
> I looked at PKGSPEC. I looked at the +CONTENTS in a package that
> depends on setuptools and there is :
> @depend devel/py-setuptools:py-setuptools->=18.2v0:py-setuptools-18.2p0v0
> which must comes from
> MODPY_SETUPUTILS_DEPEND ?= devel/py-setuptools${MODPY_FLAVOR}>=18.2v0
> in lang/python/python.port.mk
>
> and AFAIU how PKGSPEC works, it would do the same thing so I don't
> really see how it would help?
Hmmmm. Looks like I may have been wrong, I've just done a bit of testing
and it seems that changing the version part of the package spec in
MODPY_SETUPUTILS_DEPEND actually does *not* require REVISION bumps for
dependent ports.
Here's the version using PKGSPEC, but from my newer testing I think that
this would be exactly equivalent to just changing MODPY_SETUPUTILS_DEPEND.
python.port.mk:
MODPY_SETUPUTILS_DEPEND ?= devel/py-setuptools${MODPY_FLAVOR}
devel/py-setuptools/Makefile:
PKGSPEC = ${MODPY_PY_PREFIX}setuptools->=18.2v0
