On 2016-08-22, Marc Espie <es...@nerim.net> wrote: >> - to use the newer fortran (egfortran) from gcc 4.9, it's better >> to use the MODGCC4_* macros (see math/R) >> >> After all this reasoning, ports/infrastructure/mk/fortran.port.mk >> has become a simple four-liner: >> >> So, why not just removing it completely? > > Nope, you never know when it might come back. > I'm for still having the extra layer in that case.
Then shouldn't this layer cover the gcc/4.9 and g77 cases? If ports that require a newer fortran compiler can't even use that abstraction, then it's useless. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
