On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Frank Groeneveld < frank+openbsd-po...@frankgroeneveld.nl> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:51:08PM +0200, Frank Groeneveld wrote: > > Attached a port for gitlab-ci-multi-runner: > > > > --- > > A runner for Gitlab CI. It runs tests and sends the results to GitLab. > > GitLab CI is the open-source continuous integration service included > > with GitLab that coordinates the testing. > > --- > > > > My upstream patches have not all been accepted yet. I'm still waiting > > on one update of a vendored package: > > https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-multi-runner/merge_requests/139 > > > > For now, I've included that patch in its most simple form in the port. > > This results in a very long filename though, so the port is attached as > > zip file (tar could not store this long name). What's the best way to > > shorten this patch name? > > > > The final problem is the referenced prebuilt.tar.gz. I believe this is > > a very simple Docker container image that can be used by > > gitlab-ci-multi-runner to start a docker container on a docker host. > > This file is however not versioned and I'm not sure whether the contents > > will change in the future. If so, it will of course result in checksum > > errors. Should we/I cache this file somewhere and version it with the > > date? > > Anybody care to help me with these questions? I would really like to get > this imported. > > Thanks! > > Frank > > I think you missed ports lock, you will have to wait a month or so before port imports can start again.
