On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 12:55:21AM +0700, Tinker wrote:
> On 2016-05-30 00:47, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 06:48:53PM +0200, Tinker wrote:
> >
> > > On 2016-05-29 18:24, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > running analog on current sparc64 gives more coredumps coming from
> > > > libpng (via gd). At the moment I do not have time to investigate this,
> > > > so if anyone wants to give it a shot, I'd really appreciate it,
> > > >
> > > > #0 0x0000000f68e018c0 in ?? () from /usr/local/lib/libpng.so.17.2
> > > > #1 0x0000000f688f4fa4 in png_create_write_struct ()
> > > > from /usr/local/lib/libpng.so.17.2
> > > > #2 0x0000000ffc0c1ab0 in gdImagePngCtxEx () from
> > > > /usr/local/lib/libgd.so.21.1
> > > > #3 0x0000000ffc0c2784 in gdImagePng () from
> > > > /usr/local/lib/libgd.so.21.1
> > > > #4 0x0000000d4a44c270 in piechart_write () from /usr/local/bin/analog
> > > > #5 0x0000000d4a44dfa0 in piechart () from /usr/local/bin/analog
> > > > #6 0x0000000d4a4413d0 in genrep () from /usr/local/bin/analog
> > > > #7 0x0000000d4a44450c in output () from /usr/local/bin/analog
> > > > #8 0x0000000d4a426688 in main () from /usr/local/bin/analog
> > > >
> > > > -Otto
> > >
> > >
> > > Otto,
> > >
> > > Does this mean that what you have encountered is the realization
> > > that libpng
> > > is actually *BROKEN* on sparc64 currently?
> > >
> > > (Or maybe gd, we don't know;) How frequent are the crashes?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Tinker
> >
> > It's 100% reproducable.
> >
> > -Otto
>
> Ouch. Ok so libpng (maybe also libgd) is broken currently on sparc64.
>
> Did it ever work in the past for you?
>
Yes, I've run analog on this machine for quite some years.
-Otto
