On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 17:43:15 +0200
Jeremie Courreges-Anglas <j...@wxcvbn.org> wrote:
> Adam Wolk <adam.w...@tintagel.pl> writes:
>
> > Hi ports@
> >
> > Straightforward port bump but I'm upping the major as I don't trust
> > upstream that much on the ABI promise.
>
> I don't think this is a valid approach. nm -g, abi-compliance-checker
> and tarball diff all point to the same conclusion: no bump needed.
>
> > Upstream Changelog
> > ---------
> >
> > v1.7.5
> > ======
> >
> > NB: No API change since v1.7.0
> >
> > Fixes
> > -----
> >
> > 1) MINOR: fix build with musl C library
> >
> > 2) MINOR: libuv handle signals only if requested
> >
> > 3) MINOR: Fix compile warning if HTTP2 + RELEASE + ALPN-capable SSL
> >
> > 4) MINOR: produce and package
> > %{_libdir}/cmake/libwebsockets/LibwebsocketsTargets.cmake
> >
> > 5) MAJOR: make permessage-deflate enforce protocol rx buffer size
> > requirement
> >
> > ---------
> >
> > tested on a -current snapshot from Apr 5th amd64 compiled against a
> > closed source koparo.com product.
> >
> > Any feedback, OKs?
>
> OK but without the shlib version bump.
>
It went in yesterday. I'll check the symbol next time they ship a new
version. Thanks for pointing this out.
Regards,
