Makes sense to me. Plus we have www/privoxy. On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:15 PM, Michael McConville <mm...@mykolab.com> wrote: > Rationale: > > o it's been unmodified since import in 2001 > o there are patches fixing a bunch of obvious dangerous buffer issues > o it's an ad-filter proxy, so it's very exposed > > Any objections? >
- remove www/junkbuster? Michael McConville
- Re: remove www/junkbuster? Daniel Dickman
- Re: remove www/junkbuster? Stuart Henderson
- Re: remove www/junkbuster? Jeremie Courreges-Anglas