On 2016/02/29 12:53, Michael McConville wrote: > Does this look good? The distfile's slightly different - otherwise, this > is straight-forward. > > Our port's pretty out of date, too. If anyone's interested in updating > it, let me know. Otherwise, I may try in the next couple weeks.
> -SHA256 (cil-1.5.1.tar.gz) = 4hcrQFO/gGTsXqfe6/Fp0rlE9YimTBGf4xC0i1fizXs= > +SHA256 (cil-1.5.1.tar.gz) = jeaCp61ur/lSHobaIbKsVRf8vnwD56Ok+9/HKdegybo= I'd rather wait and do this alongside the update. Changing distfiles under the same name is a pain for bulk builds (they share distfiles and arches will want one distfile, some another).
