Antoine Jacoutot said: > I wouldn't call this particularly uncommon... > You said that "This should never happen" -- ok but why, because it does; so > what would trigger a rebuild like this? I don't know the first thing about > the go build system.
Generally go tries to rebuild dependencies when they are not found. I don't really understand why this detection produces such unpredictable results with this port. Interestingly, I can reliably reproduce the issue when I install go-xlsx package from mirror. When I build the package, the issue is gone. I'll try to find out during this weekend. -- Dmitrij D. Czarkoff