Antoine Jacoutot said:
> I wouldn't call this particularly uncommon...
> You said that "This should never happen" -- ok but why, because it does; so 
> what would trigger a rebuild like this? I don't know the first thing about 
> the go build system.

Generally go tries to rebuild dependencies when they are not found.
I don't really understand why this detection produces such unpredictable
results with this port.  Interestingly, I can reliably reproduce the
issue when I install go-xlsx package from mirror.  When I build the
package, the issue is gone.  I'll try to find out during this weekend.

-- 
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff

Reply via email to